About this source document
Ordinance No. 2026-01 is represented here as an official City adopted-ordinance PDF reviewed for ordinance-stated Citracado speed-limit, Council finding, CEQA, Exhibit A, and adoption-vote context only.
Why this source matters
Use this source for ordinance-stated final-decision context.
Check later sources before relying on current speed limits, current signage, and enforcement.
Full source-scope note
Use the retrieved official Ordinance No. 2026-01 PDF for ordinance-stated final-decision context only. Check staff reports, Transportation and Community Safety Commission records, current traffic schedules, current municipal-code records, City Clerk or legal sources, adopted resolutions, posted-sign records or field review, later minutes, and later official updates before relying on current speed limits, current signage, enforcement, traffic safety, current law, current traffic-schedule contents, current municipal-code completeness, later amendments, or legal interpretation.
Source snapshot
- City of Escondido · ordinance · retrieved 2026-05-24T21:43:26-07:00
Pages that use this source
Overview
Ordinance No. 2026-01 is represented here as an official City adopted-ordinance PDF linked from the City Council Adopted Ordinances page and retrieved on May 24, 2026. This page records ordinance-stated context for a Citracado speed-limit action only.
This page is not legal advice, current speed-limit guidance, current signage evidence, current traffic-schedule evidence, enforcement guidance, traffic-safety advice, route guidance, field verification, or a complete transportation file.
Source Details
- Publisher: City of Escondido.
- Source type: adopted ordinance PDF.
- Ordinance-stated adoption date: February 18, 2026.
- Retrieved snapshot date: May 24, 2026.
- Related page: Citracado Speed Limit Ordinance 2026-01.
Ordinance Context
The ordinance title says it retains the existing speed limit on one street segment.
Use that as ordinance-stated title context only. This page does not establish current posted signs, current enforceability, traffic-schedule contents, traffic-safety guidance, route guidance, or current legal effect.
Council Finding Context
The ordinance says the City Council considered the staff report, the recommendation of the Transportation Community and Safety Commission, and California Vehicle Code provisions as amended by Assembly Bill 43. It says the Council found that retaining the speed limits for the street segments attached as Exhibit A was in the City's best interest.
Use that statement only as ordinance text. Check the staff report, Transportation and Community Safety Commission records, approved minutes, current traffic schedules, current municipal-code records, adopted resolutions, and later official updates before relying on detailed speed-survey findings, current speed limits, current signage, enforcement, traffic-safety guidance, or legal interpretation.
Exhibit A Context
Exhibit A lists the street name or zone as Citracado 2 and marks it as a new segment. The listed segment is Avenida del Diablo to Harmony Grove Rd./S. Andreasen.
The Exhibit A row lists no previous speed-survey date, no existing posted speed limit, classification M, 85th percentile speed 51 mph, rounded speed 50 mph, and recommended posted speed limit 40 mph. The exhibit footnote says the value was rounded down to be consistent with the corridor by ordinance.
The Exhibit A table values were manually checked from a rendered view of PDF page 6 because default text extraction captured the heading but not the table contents. This page does not state whether signs have been posted, whether the speed limit is currently enforceable, whether current traffic schedules include the segment, or whether later ordinances or resolutions changed the segment.
Environmental Review Context
The ordinance says the proposed ordinance is not a project under CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(5) because the proposed updates are administrative activities that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment.
Use that statement only as ordinance text. This page does not provide CEQA analysis, traffic-safety advice, legal interpretation, current speed-limit guidance, signage guidance, or enforcement guidance.
Adoption Context
The ordinance says it was passed, adopted, and approved by the Escondido City Council at a regular meeting on February 18, 2026. It lists AYE votes for Fitzgerald, Garcia, Garcia, Martinez, and White, with no NOES or ABSENT councilmembers.
Use that as ordinance-stated adoption context only. Check approved minutes and later official records before relying on broader final-action history, later corrections, repeal, amendment, current-code status, current traffic schedules, current signage, or current enforcement status.
Related local context
Reviewed pages that connect this item to nearby places, organizations, records, or topics.
Evidence and maintenance
References, source snapshots, and audit notes are kept here for readers who want to verify the page or maintain it later.
Good to know
Use this page as a sourced starting point for seeing what this source supports and which local pages connect to it.
- Check a current source before relying on current speed limits, current signage, enforcement, traffic safety, current law, current traffic-schedule contents, current municipal-code...
Change and source dates
- Latest page update
- 2026-05-26
- Latest source check
- 2026-05-26
- Source snapshot
- 2026-05-24T21:43:26-07:00
Later records should be checked before treating this source as final action, current status, or complete context.
References and audit trail
References
Publication Limits
This page does not publish current posted-sign status, current speed-limit enforceability, traffic-safety advice, route guidance, current traffic-schedule contents, current traffic-schedule completeness, current municipal-code completeness, current municipal-code effect, current law, later amendments, field conditions, map metadata, imagery, appeals, litigation, or unattended claim writes.
Check staff reports, Transportation Community and Safety Commission records, current traffic schedules, current municipal-code records, City Clerk or legal sources, adopted resolutions, posted-sign records or field review, later minutes, and later official updates before relying on current speed limits, current signage, enforcement, traffic safety, current law, current traffic-schedule contents, current municipal-code completeness, later amendments, or legal interpretation.
Sources
source-2026-05-24-ordinance-number-2026-01: Ordinance Number 2026-01.- Publisher: City of Escondido
- Retrieved at: 2026-05-24T21:43:26-07:00
- Origin URL: https://www.escondido.gov/DocumentCenter/View/9277/Ordinance-Number-2026-01-PDF
Sources & verification
claim-2026-05-24-ordinance-2026-01-title(decision, text.txt lines 6-10): Ordinance No. 2026-01 is titled as a City Council ordinance retaining the existing speed limit on one street segment.claim-2026-05-24-ordinance-2026-01-council-finding(decision, text.txt lines 124-130): Ordinance No. 2026-01 says the City Council considered the staff report, the Transportation Community and Safety Commission recommendation, and California Vehicle Code provisions as amended by Assembly Bill 43, and found that retaining the speed limits for the street segments in Exhibit A was in the City's best interest.claim-2026-05-24-ordinance-2026-01-exhibit-a-segment(decision, PDF page 6, Exhibit A table; visual review of rendered PDF page): Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2026-01 lists the Citracado 2 new segment from Avenida del Diablo to Harmony Grove Rd./S. Andreasen with no previous speed survey, no existing posted speed limit, classification M, 85th percentile speed 51 mph, rounded speed 50 mph, and recommended posted speed limit 40 mph with the footnote that it was rounded down to be consistent with the corridor by ordinance.claim-2026-05-24-ordinance-2026-01-ceqa-statement(decision, text.txt lines 133-139): Ordinance No. 2026-01 says the proposed ordinance is not a project under CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(5) because the proposed updates are administrative activities that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment.claim-2026-05-24-ordinance-2026-01-adoption-vote(decision, text.txt lines 169-178 and 204-208): Ordinance No. 2026-01 says it was passed, adopted, and approved by the Escondido City Council at a regular meeting on February 18, 2026, with AYE votes listed for Fitzgerald, Garcia, Garcia, Martinez, and White, and no NOES or ABSENT councilmembers.
